Community
In an earlier blog (titled: Being purpose-led: Considerations for Financial Services firms – What does it mean?), we explored what purpose-led means with a few examples.
So far, the articulation of the (positive) impact of the aforementioned (earlier blog) financial service instances has been largely qualitative and subjective, making inferences and comparisons difficult to assess. One popular way of articulating has been the term “friction-less”, stressing on the convenience of accessing and using a product. But again, “friction” as a term has a wide spectrum of interpretations, from ease of use to ease of customization. Instead, we introduce a term “context-switch” to emphasize the motivation for and the ease of adoption of a financial outcome towards a positive impact, involving a switch from a consumer’s personal world to the service provider’s financial world. We further elaborate on the extent of a context switch for each of the selected instances, first from a consumer/customer perspective:
SinoPac flexible mortgage loan repayments
Apple Card – Goldman Sachs Apple Collaboration
John Hancock Vitality Program with Apple Watch
TransferWise (now called Wise) Payment Transfer Service
Robinhood zero commission trading
Customer’s Context Switch: Balancing future (wealth through financial investment) objectives with cost of investing
WealthFront Portfolio Line of Credit
In 4, 5 and 6, The context switch in cost to convenience trade-offs is eased significantly, with a low-cost option available without convenience overheads.
As the instances above reveal, context-switches from the consumer world into the financial world is a useful metric in assessing how (customer) purpose-led a financial service is, by focusing on the efforts needed by customers to use the financial outcomes for impact in their lives. This way, the metric provides a very specific, consistent and comparable way of articulating the value proposition of impact around a financial product/service offering.
Considerations in becoming purpose-led
The same (customer) context switches, when looked at from the financial service provider’s perspective, have implications on their business model:
In a next blog, we conclude with some thoughts on a useful guiding business model on being purpose-led for financial services firms.
Conclusions and Way Forward
In an earlier blog (titled: Being purpose-led: Considerations for Financial Services firms – Customer and Provider perspectives), we explored what purpose-led means with a few examples of Customer and Provider perspectives.
As can be seen from the implications discussed in the earlier blog, becoming purpose-led by recognizing the context-switches of their customers involves not just tweaking product interfaces but a deeper thought in absorbing such context-switches into the financial value chain. This raises important questions for financial service providers though – what are the boundaries of a financial service? What differentiates a financial service from other types of services in the consumer world? To what extent can financial services firms reimagine their involvement towards positive impact in their customer’s lives?
One useful model to guide the boundaries of purpose-led ambitions of financial services firms is Robert C Merton’s functional perspective of financial intermediation. Merton’s framework defines six key functions through which a financial system enables consumers, by enabling efficient allocation of their economic resources over time and under uncertainty. The functions and their corresponding guidance for purpose-led financial services firms could be seen as follows:
Payments system for the exchange of goods and services
Mechanism for pooling funds and sub-dividing ownership
Transfer economic resources through time and across geographic regions & industries
Manage uncertainty and control risk:
Price information that helps coordinate decentralized decision making
Ways to deal with asymmetric information and incentive problems in financial transactions
From a financial services provider perspective, the above six functions provide a very useful, bounded view of how a financial system helps consumers, by emphasizing broadly all contexts of financial relevance in a consumer world (see figure 5). Using this model, Financial services providers can shift their propositions to focus on the function of their propositions rather than the structure and features of their products. The model also helps in identifying areas of complementary collaboration and competition with other financial as well as non-financial service providers.
Conclusion and Summary
To conclude, as financial services institutions look to becoming purpose-led and ecosystems driven, they need to identify key metrics to assess how purpose-led their offerings are (beyond just convenience and ease of use) and reimagine their offerings. To come up with such metrics though, they need a (bounded) model of how financial services enable consumers’ purposes through positive impact of financial outcomes. This blog suggests a useful metric of consumer context-switches for use in assessing how purpose-led an offering is. Further, as a guide for reimagination in designing/tweaking the offerings, this blog suggests using Merton’s functional framework of financial services, for innovation, ecosystem collaboration as well as keeping track of competition in financial services.
This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.
Roman Eloshvili Founder and CEO at XData Group
02 August
Konstantin Rabin Head of Marketing at Kontomatik
Denys Boiko Founder at Erglis
01 August
Michael Zetser CEO at Flyfish
Welcome to Finextra. We use cookies to help us to deliver our services. You may change your preferences at our Cookie Centre.
Please read our Privacy Policy.