Join the Community

21,438
Expert opinions
43,598
Total members
353
New members (last 30 days)
142
New opinions (last 30 days)
28,480
Total comments

From the diary of a digital war veteran

Be the first to comment 1


- no one will be interested in that online bank (early 1980s > half a million customers were using it in Finland when Internet came)

- one-time passwords are far too difficult to use (served well until replaced mostly by face)

- the identification service does not belong to banks (it has been heard from the times of Venice). Adopted first for insurance companies in early 90s

- at least the public sector cannot accept identification services by banks (now used some 60 times/year/citizen on average - 50/50 public/private sector)

-  e-payments in e-commerce not needed as there are credit cards (direct payment still dominating in domestic e-commerce)

- online banking does not work on a mobile phone (especially the Swedes were so fond of PC-Solo at Nordea > now mobile is dominating, even if wealt services still work better in laptops)

- contracts cannot be signed with bank IDs  (e-loans introduced in late 90s, Sonera deployed for signing operator contracts in -98..)

- the Internet is not as big a deal as you claim - you shouldn't get so excited about it

- sending and receiving e-invoices is not banking (now most SMEs are signed up and almost all consumers use it)

- identity wallet applications will not be adopted in a long time, even if EUDI-complaint applications are already available both for citizens and organisations (will be rapidly installed once the public sectors first start pushing out all sorts of verified data - credentials)

- the use of data is not important in the PK sector

etc etc have been heard. We just had to keep on talking.

Has everything gone according to plans? 😎 No - and besides - if you haven't made any mistakes, you haven't tried hard enough. In any case adoption is often much slower than it should be..

What hasn't gone quite right?

- I suggested in Nordea -99 that we should organize ourselves around the data needs of citizens' life events - not "products". Too early - there was no way to collect data needed for the customer from outside the bank. Nordea has taken steps towards this - and now that everyone will have fact wallets, the service for life situations will be the starting point for everyone.

- as a member of the Visa Advisory Board, I believed that smart cards can provide services other than payments. Didn't progress.

- we believed in the Mobey Forum (where I was a founder and chair in 2000) that it is possible to create a model where citizens can freely choose any bank, telecom operator and phone where banking services, identification and other services work when one or two of the three are replaced. As a solution, we saw phones that would have had another SIM card-shaped chip supplied by the banks, which would have had a VISA card at first. Nokia was ready for mass production, but when Motorola and Ericsson, which were involved in Mobey, ran into difficulties, it did not progress despite a well-functioning prototype.

- SOLO WAP in the 90s was not particularly easy to use and communication was expensive - but it was only the first step.

- SOLO TV in the 90s with a settop box, we tried and launched for customers with a partner. It didn't fly even though it worked tolerably well.

- when the bank's loan contracts became paperless with bank ID signatures in the 90s and Sonera introduced the service for telephone contracts, I was sure that it would come to all paper or PDF contracts. Strangely, it didn't happen. Although the e-testament showed the way..

- we believed in the Mobey Forum (where I was a founder and chair in 2000) that it is possible to create a model where citizens can freely choose any bank, telecom operator and phone where banking services, identification and other services work when one or two of the three are replaced. As a solution, we saw phones that would have had another SIM card-shaped chip supplied by the banks, which would have had a VISA card at first. Nokia was ready for mass production, but when Motorola and Ericsson, which were involved in Mobey, ran into difficulties, it did not progress despite a well-functioning prototype

External

This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.

Join the Community

21,438
Expert opinions
43,598
Total members
353
New members (last 30 days)
142
New opinions (last 30 days)
28,480
Total comments

Now Hiring