Community
Ambitious financial exchanges need to keep growing. Yet in the world of capital markets this is not always a straightforward task. Each jurisdiction has its own national characteristics and different way of doing things. If an exchange decides to build its own trading or clearing infrastructure, unless it is happy paying an exorbitant cost, it will typically have to wait a number of years for delivery. So, what are the alternatives for exchanges?
Buyer beware
The advantages of establishing a new market, rather than enhancing an existing one, present an inviting opportunity for exchanges. Instead of offering tech facilities based on 20-year-old working practices, now there are exciting opportunities for exchanges to leapfrog in innovation and establish brand new markets, with a clean slate.
Advice on setting up these new markets with the supporting infrastructure and technology support is critical. Pre-trade, trading and post-trade phases all need to be carefully considered in terms of delivery, deployment and support.
When considering an adviser, it’s essential to tread carefully, especially with those from established legacy firms. Their commitment often wanes after the system reaches the deployment and delivery stages. Additionally, advisers from organisations that lack a tech-centric focus may risk developing systems that could quickly become obsolete, stifling future innovation. Another significant concern is the timeline for project completion. Advisers from such firms may not prioritise project efficiency due to their compensation models, which are typically based on the time spent rather than project milestones. This could lead to prolonged development periods, potentially stretching over several years, which can be particularly challenging in the dynamic field of financial exchanges.
Exchanges need to ensure systems are not only delivered in a timely manner but also built to be flexible and future-proof. Most importantly, they need their advisors to be fully on-board with helping them through the process of building and deployment. Additionally, in a shifting regulatory environment where requirements can frequently change, it is essential to ensure that your advisory partner remains aligned and supportive throughout the process.
A tech partner for the journey
There is a different approach, however, which is to work as partners with clients, rather than simply consulting. This is because our service does not stop once a project is defined. Ideally, turnkey solutions should be provided over the full lifecycle of the project.
Experienced architects and solution managers should work closely with clients to guide them through defining methodologies, whether that be for cloud integration, or cutting-edge on-prem and bare metal solutions. Once a project has been delivered, the team will still be on hand to sustain the change.
Knowledge for the future
The exchange industry is in the midst of a technological revolution, the likes of which are seen only once every 25 years or so. Because the trading and post-trade infrastructure is changing, a partner well-versed in groundbreaking technology is critical to help you navigate through.
This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.
Roman Eloshvili Founder and CEO at XData Group
02 August
Konstantin Rabin Head of Marketing at Kontomatik
Denys Boiko Founder at Erglis
01 August
Michael Zetser CEO at Flyfish
Welcome to Finextra. We use cookies to help us to deliver our services. You may change your preferences at our Cookie Centre.
Please read our Privacy Policy.